in ,

Hegseth Grapples with Trump’s Assertive Border Control Amid Lingering Biden Failures

As newly appointed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth steps into his role, he is met with a plethora of daunting challenges that range across a broad spectrum—from global conflicts, border issues, to routine administrative tasks. When the first light of Monday illuminates his office on the Pentagon’s third floor E Ring, the magnitude of issues waiting on his shoulders would hit him. The foremost issue that demands immediate action is President Donald Trump’s rigorous emphasis on bolstering the U.S. military presence at the southern border, raising questions about the utilization of active-duty forces for enforcement purposes—something that’s rarely been implemented.

Hegseth is anticipated to face a deluge of requisite attention-demanding issues like creating the colossal Pentagon budget, deciding on assistances for Ukraine and the Gaza cease-fire, positioning troops in the Middle East, etc. Plus his other prominent duties will include executing Trump’s directives to do away with the unnecessary diversity programs from the federal government, as well as slashing wastage, and ousting the leftovers from the former Biden administration whose support to the government was anything but beneficial.

In his interaction with the forces soon after his oath-taking, Hegseth acknowledged the multifaceted trials waiting for him. Some of the challenges, like shifting the military’s focus from the Middle East and ensuring major deterrents to China, also vexed his forerunners. Continuous provocation in the region, for instance, the disturbing attack on Israel by Hamas in October 2023, rendered this shift unachievable.

Hegseth also communicated to the service members about other priorities. It included enhancing the defense industrial base?a backbone of the defense sector, ensuring the Pentagon passes an audit?a healthy practice that guarantees accountability and transparency, and assuring that the U.S. sustains its position as ‘the mightiest and most lethal force in the world.’ The lofty sentiments here, though apparently audacious, reflect the clear-eyed realism required for America’s defense strategies.

Support staff and military leaders, including Gen. CQ Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have already been preparing for the transition. However, Hegseth is bracing himself for the overwhelming challenge often referred to as ‘drinking from a firehose’—the towering task of understanding the complex workings of the 2.1 million service members and 780,000 civilians under his purview. This includes the tens of thousands deployed overseas, some of whom are on the frontlines.

Certain cultural issues that Hegseth used to fervently criticize as a media personality didn’t make it into his address to the military. Nevertheless, the keen observers expect these issues to surface in the near future.

Hegseth, who was confirmed by Vice President JD Vance’s tiebreaking vote on Friday, is faced with the following immediate daunting challenges: Chiefly, the task of fulfilling Trump’s command of fortifying the border. Accomplishing this feat would entail understanding the complexities of troop availability, border patrol support requirements, logistics for troops and border personnel, and ensuring these operations do not interfere with other national security matters.

One of Hegseth’s earliest major hurdles will be determining if active-duty troops deployed at the border should engage in enforcing law—a movement that military leaders have been apprehensive about in recent times. The scope of the Posse Comitatus Act that restricts active-duty forces from domestic law enforcement duties poses an extra layer of challenge to it.

President Trump has affirmed an executive order nudging his defense and homeland security secretaries to provide a report within 90 days, contemplating whether the Insurrection Act of 1807, a law permitting domestic civil law enforcement by troops during emergencies, should be invoked. Traditionally, however, troop deployments have been limited to providing logistical, wall-building, transportation, and/or intelligence support. This not only freed up border patrol for interaction with migrants and law enforcement but also steered clear of controversy.

Under his first executive order, Trump reversed the protections for transgender troops that President Joe Biden, despite his best efforts, had put in place, thereby reinstating his previous ban. This decision is expected to face legal challenges once more as lawyers representing transgender service members are gearing up for a new court battle. While not outright banning yet, this rollback of protections is seen as a step in that direction.

Just how many troops would feel the impact of such ruling is unclear. The Defense Department has no concrete data regarding the exact number of transgender troops. This is due to the fact that not all of them at the same point in their medical transition and not all identify so in their military documentation. The services have also expressed inability to keep any track of it due to this reason.

A critical job waiting for Hegseth is to build a familiarity with the complex and gigantic Pentagon budget construction, which currently stands at an astonishing $850 billion. Trump ran his campaign based on the promise to fortify the U.S. military, a sentiment prominently echoed by Hegseth.

However, they both share a view on minimizing waste which would add even more complexities to the budgeting task. Hegseth’s media record clearly shows he doesn’t share the liberal perspective of indiscriminate government spending, making the job even more challenging.

All these circumstances accumulate into a tumultuous beginning for the new Defense Secretary, setting the stage for an intriguing set of decisions and directional accusations. It remains to be seen how effective Hegseth’s traversal of this precarious path would prove to be.